Proposed Modifications to the Thanet Local Plan

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

5 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
C Solly 27 Jan 2020

Main Modifications Chapter 11 - Housing MM/114 MM/114

  • Comment ID: 437
I refer to my previous representation that has been made on this policy
Barbara Cooper - Kent County C… 27 Jan 2020

Main Modifications Chapter 11 - Housing MM/114 MM/114

  • Comment ID: 305
The Transport Assessment should encourage a modal transport shift towards walking and cycling. High quality, traffic-free walking and cycling routes integrate effectively with the wider transport network. These links should provide realistic travel alternatives to short distance car journeys, offering direct and convenient access. Increasing active travel participation would help to reduce vehicle congestion on roads, address issues of air quality and improve public health and well-being. The C
Alan Byrne/English Heritage 24 Jan 2020

Main Modifications Chapter 11 - Housing MM/114 MM/114

  • Comment ID: 118
MM114 - object to removal of archaeological evaluation requirement in bullet 1.
- - St John's College 21 Jan 2020

Main Modifications Chapter 11 - Housing MM/114 MM/114

  • Comment ID: 85
(See attached response.) Savills acts on behalf of St John's College who own the northern extent of allocation HO12 and these comments are consequently made in relation to this interest. As discussed during the Hearing Sessions, the need for consistency in policy phrasing for strategic allocations is supported to avoid unintended inferences being made should there be differences in approach to wording. The Local Plan must be read as a whole and it is agreed that all those points deleted are cov
Julie Davies - CPRE Kent 20 Jan 2020

Main Modifications Chapter 11 - Housing MM/114 MM/114

  • Comment ID: 68
Main modifications have been made to the non-strategic housing allocations "for clarity and effectiveness and consistency with the format of the strategic housing policies" – densities have not been referred to in policies HO1, HO11 and HO12. It is also not clear whether the density in policies HO12, HO13, HO14, HO15, HO16 and HO17 are net or gross. Some capacities listed in policy HO11 are not consistent with detailed policies for same sites. Where specified density aspirations are cited as