Proposed Revisions to Draft Local Plan (Preferred Options)

Comment ID 16652513/1/8530260/-
Document Section 3. Other Comments (no name) [View all comments on this section]
Respondent Michael Davis [View all comments by this respondent]
Response Date 11 Apr 2017
Do you consider the document is Legally Compliant?
Do you consider the document is Sound?
On which grounds do you consider the document unsound? (if applicable)
Comment

Summary Map is far too small to see any details on. Why was it not rotated 90 Deg. and made much bigger.

I would like to see a large supermarket development on the edge of Birchington, perhaps near Planet Earth where locals could shop to save going all the way to Westwood Cross. A corner shop in this age would not last long.

What changes do you suggest to make the document legally compliant or sound?
Do you consider it necessary to participate at the oral part of the examination?
Why do you feel it is necessary to participate at the oral part of the examination?
Attachments
Officer's Response Not yet available.
Proposed Change
Notes