Proposed Revisions to Draft Local Plan (Preferred Options)

Comment ID 16632225/1/8530260/1
Document Section 3. Other Comments (no name) [View all comments on this section]
Respondent Luke Warburton [View all comments by this respondent]
Response Date 17 Mar 2017
Do you consider the document is Legally Compliant?
Do you consider the document is Sound? No
On which grounds do you consider the document unsound? (if applicable)
  • Not Justified

Preferred by who? Having read through previous feedback, I'm struggling to see how this revision is in alignment with people's preferences. In fact, it has gone the opposite, what with an increase in housing requirements. My previous comments are not answered from the consultation before, so I expect these to be put forward again. Road infrastructure in not able to cope. Schools, doctors and other services are already at a strain. Until we can prove Thanet can handle its current level of occupancy, no growth should be considered. Green spaces are for growing food for our current population, not housing an unrealistic growth projection. 

What changes do you suggest to make the document legally compliant or sound? See previous.
Do you consider it necessary to participate at the oral part of the examination? No
Why do you feel it is necessary to participate at the oral part of the examination?
Officer's Response Not yet available.
Proposed Change